YOU CAN

Friday, March 21, 2014

inspired from Solnit's "Field Guide to Getting Lost"

5am, November 16, 2013
indigo... i know it is complex. and I know that indigo is not blue. And I argue that the "blue" Solnit references in her book, is really actually closer to indigo -but fair enough, who are we, on this earth, to rightly refer to anything as indigo anyway.

that said, How is indigo related to dispersion of light?

If I have concluded in my recent work that "light" is "god"and indigo is the color of "god", is indigo the lost light of god?

Is it the light that never reaches us? -because we are essentially out of reach from the heavens, we are here, on this floor, lost. Is indigo the lost god that is still only accessible through moments of hallucination, "insanity", or intoxication? Solnit says blue is the color of the atmospheric distance between here and there- it is the longing. Do psychedelics allow us to be in that blue-space?

And gold. I think about gold when I think about the European colonial men that survived and continued across North America to the wild west of California (whom Solnit writes about as well). The ones who came here for the gold. The ones that engaged that atmospheric indigo between where they were and the wild west, but what they saw in their minds eye was not infact blue, nor indigo, but real element metal gold. This unseen gold became the drive, invited their experience of longing.

So, I ask myself, when considering the historical and current collective psyche of California, of the Bay Area, Are we searching for gold amongst the indigo -is this the fractured capitalism within the sacred longing of lostness?

And is it perchance, precisely that which I am grappling with so deeply in my work of God Sees Everything? grappling with something so disconnected and so old, I can hardly explain to others what exactly I am even talking about.


all images by Drew Mandinach, 2013, solo performance, Los Angeles





Friday, December 20, 2013

images


god sees everything image and video documentation









Thursday, December 12, 2013

Thoughts and writing on God Sees Everything

I need to write more

I spoke with Ben about Sunday. About how it worked and didn't work. About how I need to get clear on the content of the work.

  • On WHY I am doing this project. I am doing this project to come to terms with the vastness of the universe and how we all know that to be true but the ways in which we socially and culturally deal with that can be dangerous, unclear, and misleading. I am trying work within that space between what we know to be deeply mystifying god-like universal spirituality and the most corrupt realities of our society. And I investigating the space via psychedelic drugs because psychedelics so clearly straddle those two worlds.
    • psychedelics relate to trash, to nazi germany, to capitalism, to privilege, to experiences of freedom, to corruption, to lies and story-telling, to manipulation, to California idealism, to hypocritical hippy cultures, to opportunities, to cultures of art and music and parties and raves and aesthetic and whiteness, to white culture, to to the belief systems of whites as more evolved, more enlightened. To mythos of white people coming from stars, to the commodification of spiritual experiences, to drug policy, drug wars, to organized religion
    • psychedlics relate to oneness, collectivity, vastness, light, god, the universe, dimensions of time and space, to patterns and geometric shapes, to transformation, to healing, to PTSD, to mental illnesses, to growing and forgiving and seeing things differently, to letting go, to surrendering to a drug, to leaving reality as we most often experience it. 
  • On what I am saying. I am saying, "Hey, these worlds are related and unhealed. You can acknowledge it all at the same time."
  • On what the purpose of this work is. To work within the relationship between disparity and oneness. To the desperately intimate proximity of wholeness and fragmentation through the topic of psychedelic drugs.
  • What Am I trying to say? That is the only place that God lives and it is not easy, it is not integrated, or comfortable, but it is what we have and I can only consider both the light and the dark in order to make work worth making.
  • There is this interest in GOD. In religion. In the spiritual. 
  • I want to know how do we cope with that elusive intimate proximal mind-bending unknown-yet-unquestionably-sensed truth (aka God). 
  • How psychedelic drugs bring us closer to that? And how is that crazy thing I am referring to as God so implicitly tied to politics, to society, to privilege, to race, to history, to capitalism, to body politics. How does one reconcile that? 
  • Is this project my attempt to reconcile that? I don't think so. I mean, I don't have any plans for reconciling, just acknowledging, seeing, noting, listening, being aware of that implicit relationship. And I am trying to understand that often unconscious and complex and tricky relationship between God and body politics.


I find a lot of people, colleagues, friends have strong opinions about psychedelic drugs. Some of them are affirming their power and importance, others are questioning and casting doubt about the need for them. But they do exist. In nature. In labs. And they do things to people that change them irrevocably.

One of the things I thought about on Sunday but also before Sunday is how if you see someone on say psilocybin for example, they don't appear enlightened or alive and awake to the universe and connected to all. Sometimes they feel gone, unavailable, dumb, out of it, confusing, weird, boring. But their experience is one of connection and awareness and lightness and aliveness. So what is the disconnect there about? Why is that the case? How is that experience so "real" and yet so isolated within the self and/or only with others on drugs? And I also think that when people are on psychedelic drugs they might find sober people to be closed, unaware, different, scary, intimidating but maybe also beautiful, perfect, and lovely. There is this clear separation. Within such a mind-blowing spiritual experience such as psychedelic drugs, what is that fragmentation about?

Another thought: People keep talking about how drugs stories are like dreams, no one fucking cares except the person telling the story because the essence is so non-transmittable within the context of conversation/words. Hmmm... maybe this dance project is to represent and transmit every lost drug story, every disregarded or misunderstood dream.

The more and more I think about Sunday, the more I value it. The more real and alive and intimate I realize it was. I wrote a lot of memories about it the other day. I thought about posting them here... not sure if I will yet.





Tuesday, December 10, 2013

God Sees Everything: L.A. and S.F.



homeLA, November 2013





The News, SOMArts, San Francisco, December 2013











Friday, October 18, 2013

Anne Bogart and Judith Butler ideas that I am relating to collective TRANSFORMATION

In A Director Prepares: Seven Essays on Art and Theatre by Anne Bogart, on pages 61-63 in the essay on eroticism she talks about static art. about static inspiration. something that stops you in your tracks:



What Bogart fails to do is discuss or note the death, the loss, the mourning, the second phase of change that is possible once that attachment/relationship is made. She clarifies that there is an initial change and/or one that is drawn out over the relationship ("extended intercourse") through the avenues of vulnerability involved in our "socially constituted bodies". But what happens when that relationship is over or lost? This risk/experience/possibility is not covered by Bogart, but I found Judith Butler discusses this phase in Precarious Life on page 20:

Loss and vulnerability seems to follow from our being socially constituted bodies, attached to others, at risk of losing those attachments, exposed to others, at risk of violence by virtue of that exposure...

she the continues on page 21:

...Perhaps, rather, one mourns when one accepts that by the loss one undergoes one will be changed, possibly for ever. Perhaps mourning has to do with agreeing to undergo a transformation (perhaps one should say submitting to a transformation) the full result of which one cannot know in advance.

So is there a #8 and #9 to Bogart's list? and could it be something like,

8. There is an end to that intercourse. A loss.
9. Following that loss, is a mourning that is ultimately, if successful, transformational. There is a second irrevocable change that is just as unplanned and uncharted as the initial erotic arrest.


-----------------------------------------******-------------__________________-------------------------------

So god sees everything. Because we are inextricably tied to one another. Because when we have transformations within our own autonomous bodies and selves which happen to also be unavoidably social, relating, connected, we are participating in a larger collective transformation. And it is clear to me that not only do people take psychedelic drugs to induce such transformations, and that many claim to experience them during their trips, but that one common experience of these drug induced states is a deepened and clear understanding and knowing of that connectivity, collectivity, oneness within the experience of love and understanding.

why is this project called god sees everything? because there are two realities being straddled here: there is the one in which I am fascinated by the collective oneness of the universe- this sacred universality that is often brought into awareness through the use of psychedelics. And secondly, simultaneously, I am aware of the "political god" in it all. I am aware of the fractured, institutionalized, privileged, surfaced, hypocrisy that is entrenched in the world of drugs- be it pharmaceuticals, or drug wars, or drug politics, or ritualized or appropriated and/or de-ritualized inductions that wreak violence and further fragment the oneness that is ultimately undeniably true.




Monday, October 14, 2013

shining bright like a diamond

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/168541-diamond-rain-falls-on-jupiter-and-saturn




watch time pass/see space change

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ew3SQiFGR0

painter for the future.
secrets. being held in the hues of paints in circles and symmetry. Being a woman as being a secret for the future because being a woman in the present is always casted out by bigness of our male counterparts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPAat-T1uhE

I am struggling to interview people. To talk to them. I feel like I need to go drink beer at Telegraph with a sign that says I am interviewing people about their stories of psychedelics.

I feel behind in my project. I miss the studio. I miss space with other movers. I made some of the biggest mistakes of my life in the last few months.

I feel very isolated as an artist right now and I would say most of it is self-imposed.


Saturday, September 21, 2013

this is exciting to me


http://dancingopportunities.com/index.php/johannes-wieland-workshop/

especially after watching this: http://www.johanneswieland.org/productions/


2 DOTS AND A LINE

I figured out a title for my current proj: God Sees Everything 

this is thanks to United Airlines playing Great Gatsby on the plane.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTruPQDa_vc

also, look at this:

http://ceruleanorange.tumblr.com/post/38984081707/feministrepublican-white-privilege-is-being

some of my recent research/work/stuff for GSE

“The key, I think, is to acknowledge that we are part of the physical  causal fabric of the world, but to also recognize that we are the part capable of acting with malicious intent. That’s the hook of praise and blame.” -Manuel Vargas


2 DOTS AND A LINE


“Ambiguity is important not just for design or science. it’s also central to art.” -tversky
“ambiguity is a source of ideas and pleasure.” -tversky

gestures can show action effectively.
16/9/13
...FOUND ME
YOU FOUND ME.
NONOS FOUND ME
KOOTIE FOUND ME
THE COYOTE FOUND ME
ARTISTS FOUND ME
BARRYS FOUND ME
ANNA AND HENRY FOUND ME
OBEA FOUND ME
KRISTINE FOUND ME
THE ROOST FOUND ME
ONA FOUND ME
THE BEACH FOUND ME
TREES FOUND ME
THE SUNLIGHT FOUND ME
SCIENCE FOUND ME
DANCE FOUND ME
BACKWARDS FOUND ME
PHOTOS AND LIGHT FOUND ME
SLEEP FOUND ME
PILLS FOUND ME
CHOCOLATE FOUND ME
FAKE GRASS FOUND ME
AGE FOUND ME
TIME FOUND ME
DEATH FOUND ME
PAIN FOUND ME
ABUSE FOUND ME
FRIENDS FOUND ME
MIRAGE FOUND ME- HEAT FOUND ME
NUDITY FOUND ME
SPARKLERS FOUND ME
PAIN FOUND ME
RED CAFETERIA CUPS FOUND ME
BAD ART FOUND ME
ARISTOCRACY FOUND ME
POVERTY FOUND ME
DEBT FOUND ME
EDUCATION FOUND ME
ICE FOUND ME
RAPE FOUND ME
EXIT FOUND ME
RUNNING FOUND ME
I FOUND ME
LOVE FOUND ME
FAILURE FOUND ME





Sunday, May 26, 2013

work: activity directed toward the production or accomplishment of something.

I think the ways in which life works on us is one of the most sacred ways in which beauty is instilled in our bones. Life has this way of acting on our bodies. Life has control we don't have. It does things to us. Recently, I have been rubbing almond oil all over my skin when I get out of the shower. Skin- that outermost layer of the body, the largest organ, the entrance. Skin is the part of the body we have most accessible to look at, study, feel, touch. There are so many other changes going on that we are not visually aware of. When I sit there in a towel and my underwear and massage my skin, I notice the markings of life like small bruises and ingrown hairs, the shifting and coming and going of weight and fat and muscle, the paleness of winter months and the sun kissed color of summer, the softness and roughness, wrinkles, thinness/thickness of skin, pronouncing veins on my hands, the cellulite on my thighs, the freckles along my arms, the size of my bones and my organs having grown from when I was a child, watching my breasts grown down, surrendering to the pull from the center of the Earth. It is endless and I am always so inspired by all that is happening in and on my body at any moment. It informs me. It is my teacher. 

My hair is darker. When I was a child it was white. I hope one day I come full circle.

I am listening to Patti Smith. She is someone who seems to have embraced the life's doing to her. She just let it all happen to her and it is from there that she made work. It's possibly why we all love her work so much. So much of society these days is about fighting life's doing, about taking that control back in an obsessive way- 

God forbid we are strong AND weak. God forbid we are fortified by the strength of our own beings and our own power and simultaneously softened and humbled by all the shit that is thrown at us within a life time. 

And if god forbid it, then call me a sinner because I want it. I want to be strong and healthy and vibrant and powerful. I also want to experience weakness, failure, pain, scars, and the ever-increasing proximity to death. Because, to me, that is as beautiful as I can possibly be. And ya'll know I LOVE BEAUTY. 


Friday, March 15, 2013

transformation

I have been thinking a lot about transformation within performance art. How it matters to me. I have been thinking about work that involves discomfort; work that induces a shifting of the viewer's internal constitution has the immense power to be quite a transformative experience. This in many ways is optimal as far as my work is concerned.

Just a couple of days ago I took part in an audition. Within this context, another participant and I had to create a small duet. In short, we chose to leave the end of our duet to be in the hands of everyone else in the room, knowing that there was a time limit within the audition and eventually they would need to stop our performance.

It was successful and impactful, at least for myself. I began to think about responsibility of transformation. It truly is divine when the universe almost knows more of what one needs than that person themselves. What I mean to be saying is, sometimes, god bless, life just takes your hand and guides you through something that irrevocably changes you for the better in ways you could never have instigated nor understood yourself. But so often, life just does Part I: life hands your lemons. And it is you that must make lemonade. It is you that steps over the line from crisis to catharsis. From plight to peace. These self actualized maturations build character and layer strands onto the rope of wisdom that becomes one's backbone. And so, who am I to take the hand of my viewers through to the other side? Who am I to even know how that is done. Who am I to reinforce the constructs of passivity of the viewer?

Maybe what is more useful is to offer space and time to that transformation. To say, if I hand you lemons  and nothing else, will you, in your dedication to life, make the most refreshing lemonade? Will you go home with curiosity and power? Will you respond to what is happening in the room with you? Will you find those limits in yourself and then take the appropriate action as an equal, as a participant?

So... I don't think in all this reflecting that I should now go on to make work that generates crisis and not offer suggestions of transformation, but I do want to invite you (whomever you ever are who witnesses my work) to engage and respond and to be equally curious as I in the work and how it relates to you and to this world.




Monday, November 5, 2012

ah! The weather is amazing. I am procrastinating on my grad school applications and enjoying a well-crafted Bay Arean americano. So this should be short- really I should be done before my caffeine peak, so that I can use that induced high for the good of the application process and not rambling here.

I saw Sara Shelton Mann's solo performed by Jorge Rodolfo De Hoyos Jr. I truly enjoyed it. I think it would benefit being performed in a larger space than the Joe Goode Annex, which Sara was hinting at earlier in the day. I would see it again. Maybe 5 more times.

I also participated in Melinda Ring's project Mouse Auditions. I have tons to say about that. About all it encompassed regarding voyerism, auditions, director versus interpreters, power agreements, and the humiliation within those topics. I think there are ways it could have been better executed. I think it would have been very different in another context (i.e. a more urban setting or a more populated place such as a museum). It was first put on at the Whitney Biennial. I am sure the outcome there was vastly different. I felt some loss as to what my part was in it and the why I should invest in it became unclear. Usually in the context of an audition there is competition and a sense of "pick me. pick me!!" But here, we all understood there would never be any picking. So I think the tension diluted for this. The public viewing definitely gave me the sense of performing, but it wasn't clear what I was performing. So, maybe Ring was going for that lack of clarity and I think it brought forth some interesting experiences for the participants and the audience, but I also think it clouded it and made it in some regards, uninteresting. I hope I see Melinda Ring continue to investigate this project and find ways to make it thrive and be at it's potential.

I am working on my solo, GOLD. I am finding my way out of the cream-of-wheat-type-confusion and back into precision and clarity.

at Lobot Gallery, on The Fountain.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

about my solo practice: writing during my residency at ODC

OK, so here I am with a residency at ODC. it doesn't include rehearsal space nor a budget nor class discounts. I mean it really isn't a residency about support. It is a residency about us discovering how we support ourselves, how we manage with nothing, how we self-produce without a budget. It's funny to me that there is a residency for such a thing. I keep hearing mentors talk about the "real world" and about not expecting to get paid. I keep asking myself WHY is this the norm? WHY are we telling the emerging artists that they need to expect NOT to get paid. What are we doing? Why is this considered OK and furthermore, why is it what we are continuing to accept and teach to the future artists? It reminds me of women telling their daughters not to speak out, not to ask to be paid the same as men, not to be sexually empowered, etc. etc. How are we viewing ourselves? Where is the critical dialogue about the status quo and what we intend to do about it? I know that I don't feel good about this acceptance of disregard and devaluing of dance artists. I don't particularly have a solution, but it is a topic that I think we can collectively investigate.

Nonetheless, I am doing the residency. I am doing the work. And my chosen idea/focus/interest is my solo practice. What is it that I do when i am alone in the studio? What is it that I do when I am alone or with others, regardless. What is MY PRACTICE? pfff.... good fucking question. I have watched myself over the last month basically not practicing. not rehearsing, not working. I have rehearsed once, but it was not organized. Time was spent errantly playing with the work. I recorded it but moved the camera 5 mins into the rehearsal and ultimately recorded 90 minutes of the ceiling. I have written about the work and scribbled ideas down. I have played with the material and thought about costumes. But without format. Without organized discipline. Now, I think there is value to unorganized creative time/space. But without the container (aka the practice/method/format) the creatively is blown away like dust in the wind.

So, what do I have for tomorrow's showing? I have dust in my eyes. The dust I am supposed to be dancing in. The dust I want on my skin. because it makes my skin soft and grounded. the dust connects my skin to my bones, if that makes sense.

So, I want to write a bit about GOLD, but first, I am going to publicly PLAN my method. My solo method. MY practice. I think I want it to involved silence/stillness, chaos, writing, and precision/exactness.

Here is my plan for now:
10 minutes of silence/stillness
10 minutes of warm up
10 minutes of CHAOS, CRAZINESS, MESSY BOUNDARY CROSSING
30 minutes of organized honing of choreography, using tools and focusing on precision, speed, and exactness(recorded)
10 minutes of exploration and open score of exactness(recorded)
10 minutes of writing

total rehearsal time: 1 hr 20 mins

**I'll let ya'll know how it goes. 

GOLD

well dear solo, dear sparkly friend, dear dirt, dear failure, dear self absorption, dear earth.

I chose failure. During last summer, I went to the YBCA to see a queer women of color film festival and there was a documentary about a witch. She told us that she used to have rage as a child. She used to get so so so angry and her mother would command, "Go outside! And DIG a hole in the earth and get in it!!!" And so this child would do just this. She would go outside and dig a hole and get in and be there for sometimes hours. Finally her mother would come outside, kneel down to her child, putting dirt on the child's forehead and kissing her, and calmly say, "Mother Earth has taken all your anger, hasn't she? Come on inside now love and have a cup of tea."

My soul wants to do this. To dig a hole. and get inside and stay there and let the anger and grief and shame seep from my body into the earth. I want the dirt to cradle my bones and sweep my skin.

What is the gold about? Why is it there? is it the excellence? Is it the assumed excellence? the idea of excellence? the fear of failure? is it real? cultural? Is it because I like gold? I like it's richness. I like how it lives in the dirt, with the dirt, encased in dirt, like my bones and my skin.

http://ldolphin.org/Gold.html

walking in circles before laying down: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1YX6A3MKVs

this solo is about failure.











Friday, September 14, 2012

in response to http://spangbergianism.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/seventeen-points-for-the-future-of-dance/

First off, i just need to write some. I dont know how much of this is actually a response to this guy's list of heady claims, but, while reading it, I realized I need to voice all in my head about dance. 

These months, in San Francisco and Oakland, I have been much more reserved in my interactions with dancers here. I don't know them very well. I definitely don't call them or go for a beer with them after shows, or even go to shows with them, or talk to them. In fact, i spend most of my time alone or with visual artists and non dance-focused people. I am sincerely informed within my work in dance just as much by these others as I might be with dancers themselves. 

last night I was talking about the word dance and the term choreographer. Yesterday I was looking at Tere O'Connor's new blog, BLEED. I was think about his project that is somehow a trilogy or a tri-part project based on his ways of thinking or something. It immediately came across as "white man makes trilogy about his brilliant head."... I was kinda like, "what? there are 3 distinct ways in which your mind makes dance. and you can separate them? And you want to do that? And you think that is what dance should be sourced from? your own head." Do we think our heads are special in a way that makes us want to focus on the specialness? I am not sure that is effective. Also, I have always really loved O'Connor's work. Sometimes I realize though how locked into classical technique it is. How NYC it is.   And how NYC sometimes instills this slightly cheesy tacky crisp American-pop-ego into the dance that happens there and it worries me sometimes. 

And then there is the academia of dance. The other white male, younger, and his caffeine induced exclamations about the future of dance. "dance as we know it is a dead opera." "Choreography is not the art of making dances (a directional set of tools), it is a generic set of capacities to be applied to any kind of production, analysis or organization." 

#2, 3, 4, 7, 9 OMIT- it's obvious and old and unnecessary in his point making. #8 needs to be expanded on.

10. For dance to have a future it needs to engage in a process of deskilling, i.e. to cancel the proprietary understanding of technique in favor of individual or context specific constructions of abilities, over the generic sense of dance as a sui generis technology.

- I beg to differ. 

#11, why are you talking about architects and Fordism... it's too blablabla. What are you trying to say? Don't use the term Fordism- you sound like an idiot.

#12, great point. yes, I think we must consider ALL bodies. All elements. All parts. But in a society where non-human-body objects are the focus, where most people, who are not dancers, don't even consider the body and have much more awareness in the choreography of non-human-bodies, I worry that this idea needs to be complicated a bit in order to really function. BMC exists in response to the focus on everything but the human body- or at least offers a more integrated way of experiencing the body. Anyway, BMC is out-dated and Axis Syllabus is a much more developed methodology to consider. You might be proposing that we need to just be focusing on the relations of ALL bodies at any given time. To consider them with equal relevance. 

#13 really?

#14 You could have just written the last sentence. And anyway, we all know that. 

#15... 

anyway, I suggest reading the works of the female authors that presented some of these ideas long before this guy: for example, Anne Bogart or Judith Butler



Tuesday, May 1, 2012

My solo:

current title: "Near misses of excellence"

some writing on my solo. it involves fabricated space. it invites you into a room which is the thing left unsaid. it is the entrance into the near misses. the desired misses. the near misses of excellence are chosen? and is the excellence kept in this room? in this vast space. because that is what it feels like.





happening here (photo credit: kristine eudey)